Nina Jankowicz’s new book, “How to Be a Woman Online,” writes about the vitriol she and other women encountered by trolls and other bad characters. He is now in the midst of a new fire of criticism, this time past his appointment to lead the advisory group at the Department of Homeland Security. about the threat of false information.
The formation of the board, announced last week, has turned into a battle of false information itself – and what role, if any, the government should have in false police, sometimes poisonous, and even online violence.
Within hours of the announcement, Republican lawmakers began cracking down on the Orwellian-led coalition, accusing Biden’s leadership of creating a “government watchdog” for police speculation. Two experts wrote in a statement in The Wall Street Journal that the short message to the new Disinformation Council was simply “a letter from the KGB,” Soviet Union security service.
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, found himself on the defensive. In a televised interview with CNN on Sunday, he said the new leadership was a small group, that it had no working rights or capabilities and that it would not monitor Americans.
“We in the Department of Homeland Security do not care about the American people,” he said.
Mr. Mayorkas’s acknowledgment did little to alleviate the outrage, revealing the controversy the skeptics had become popular. Faced with questions about the board on Monday, White House Chief of Staff Jen Psaki said he represented the ongoing work that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency has started this year. 2020, according to the previous administration.
Its mission is to monitor the department’s response to the potential impact of the threat of false information – including foreign elections, such as Russia in 2016 and beyond in 2020; efforts by smugglers to support cross-border migrants; and online publications that can lead to counter-attacks. Ms. Psaki did not elaborate on how the temple would interpret the meaning of the online villain. He said the board would decide to make public its findings of false information, although “a lot of this work is really about work that people will not see.” Every day that is being done by the Department of Homeland Security. “
Many of the critics of the board’s Ms. Jankowicz’s previous comments, online and out, accused him of being abusive. They suggest – without basis – that it would be forbidden to use legitimate language.
Two ranking Republicans on the National Committee for Intelligence and Homeland Security – Michael R. Turner of Ohio and John Katko of New York – recently made remarks in which he referred to the laptops of Hunter Biden, the president’s son, spoke of Elon Musk’s bid to buy Twitter. evidence of injustice.
Ms. Jankowicz, 33, commented in his book and in a public statement that online misinformation and misrepresentation can lead to violence and other offline offenses. – the type of threat that was created to monitor. Her book focuses on research into abuses that key women face, including Vice President Kamala Harris after her 2020 election.
Ms. Jankowicz has called on media companies and law enforcement agencies to crack down on online harassment. Such sentiments have led to warnings that the government should not crack down on online police content; he was also passionate about Mr. Musk, who said he wanted to buy Twitter to free his users from such restrictions that in his opinion violated the freedom of speech.
“I’m afraid to think, if free speech were to be used on multiple platforms, that would have been the case for marginalized communities around the world, which are already suffering so much, the skepticism of the This abuse, “Ms. Jankowicz told NPR in an interview last week about his new book, about people who are attacked online, especially women and people of color.
A tweet he sent, using part of that quote, said by Mr. Turner and Mr. Katko in their letter to Mr. Mayorkas. Application “all information and communication” about the establishment of the board and Ms. Jankowicz elected as his leader.
The board quietly began work two months ago, part-time staffed by staff from other parts of the main building. The Department of Homeland Security decided to form a board last year after it completed a summer course that recommended setting up a board to investigate the questions. of privacy and civil liberties. for online content, according to John Cohen, former director of the Department of Intelligence.
“And to make sure that when the building materials department did this inspection, they were working as their police officers,” Mr. Cohen, who stepped down last month, said in an interview.
Mr Cohen pushed back the claim that the group would be a police online presence.
“It’s not a big room with food from Facebook and Twitter appearing,” Cohen said. “He looks at issues of law, he looks at best practices, he looks at research studies on the lack of information on environmental threats.”
After studying the questions about the law, the board should send instructions to the national security secretary on how different organizations should conduct the review of the content. online while protecting the civil liberties of Americans, and how much of the findings of the screening can be shared.
According to a statement on Monday, the agency said the board would look into “false information leaked by foreign states such as Russia, China and Iran, or other countries.” enemies such as immigration and human smuggling organizations. ” The report also addresses inaccurate data that could be transmitted during natural disasters, such as inaccurate data on drinking water safety during Hurricane Sandy in 2012.
It is not the first time that the Department of Homeland Security has moved to identify false information as a threat to the country. The agency has been involved with the FBI in publishing terrorist articles warning that the misinformation about the 2020 elections and the Capitol protests on January 6, 2021, could lead to the release of terrorists. area of the country.
Mr. Mayorkas defended Ms. Jankowicz, calling him an “expert” who is “capable of doing well” to inform the department of the climate threat posing in fecund air online. At the same time, he acknowledged the error of the board’s announcement – made in a simple announcement last week.
“I think maybe we can do a better job of communicating what he does and does not do,” he told CNN.
Ms. Jankowicz has been a proponent of misrepresentation for many years. He has worked for the National Democratic Institute, an affiliate of the National Endowment for Democracy that promotes foreign democracy, and works at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington.
As a friend of Fulbright, he worked as a consultant to the Ukrainian government in 2017. His 2020 book, “How to Lose the Information War: Russia, Fake News and the Future of Objections, “focuses on Russia’s weapon of record. He warned that the government was poorly prepared and incapable of defending false information.
An article from his autobiography on the Wilson Center website describes the challenges for those who will oppose the misinformation.
“Disinformation is not a group issue; It’s a democracy, and it will take cooperation – across parties, across sections, across governments, and across borders – to defeat it, “he said.