Development of Privacy Information

The latest attempt to establish the first national privacy law in the United States is a breach in Washington. But through the turmoil in Congress and elsewhere in the US, we have finally seen an increase in the protection of the US from the unrestricted data-harvesting industry.

The result is a growing consensus and the body of (negative) policies that give people real control and companies have a greater responsibility to maintain near-zero restrictions. of our materials. Given all the challenge, tacky lobbying tactics and gridlock, it might not seem like a win by close. But it is.

Let me zoom out to the big picture in US tech companies like Facebook and Google, most do not know the average person data and even local retailers have collected data from us that will help get their business.

We benefit from these systems in some ways, including when businesses see better customers through advertising campaigns. But there is too much information of each person, with some restrictions on its use, creating the conditions for abuse. It also distrusts the public about technology and technology companies. Even some companies that have benefited from data collection are not currently restricted that the system needs to be modified.

Clever rules and regulations are part of the answer, but there is no quick fix – and there can be disadvantages. Some privacy advocates have said for years that Americans want government privacy laws that protect them wherever they are. Members of Congress have discussed, but failed, such legislation in the last few years.

What is different now is that big companies, party-makers and dead-hard privacy seem to agree that national privacy is welcome. Their support and view of the law as such, however, is different. This is where he gets frustrated.

An organization that includes companies and the technology industry has kicked off a recent advertising campaign that calls for private property law – but only on in special circumstances, to minimize the impact on their business.

They want to ensure that federal law will override the privacy rights of the strong state, so businesses can follow one expression rather than many other contradictions. xeeb. Businesses also hope that the legislation passed by Congress does not affect them more than anything that the Federal Trade Commission, which now has a majority of Democrats, uses.

This is one of those war laws that is not viewed from the outside and keeps consumers private for a long time. Evan Greer, leader of the digital rights group Fighting for the Future, told me he sees what lobbyists advocate as “watered down, business-friendly rules that contain the privacy of the name only. “

Behind the muck, however, a consensus emerges on several key elements of federal privacy law. Even the most important points – even federal law must be passed in state law, and whether people can sue for privacy violations – now seem to have where the center works. One possibility is that federal law will bypass a state law in the future but not the existing one. And people will be given the right to be prosecuted for privacy violations under certain circumstances, including criminal recidivism.

Legal is not a fix-all for our digital privacy. Even smart civil laws create unwanted businesses, and sometimes poor design or inadequate management can lead to negative consequences. Sometimes the new rules can feel meaningless.

Most people encountered with Europe 2018 swipe 2018 privacy policy, General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR, are unreliable reports of cookie tracking data. The first of two of California’s digital privacy laws in theory deals with how people manage their information, but in practice often includes insufficient documentation. And recently the private legal case in Virginia and Utah has often given businesses the cluster they need.

Is there an increase in the protection of our data? Well, yes!

Some privacy advocates may disagree with this, but even bad policies and a change in the minds of citizens and policymakers are big changes. They point out that the impossibility of U.S. data collection is inconsistent and many responsibilities are shifted to data collection companies, not humans, to uphold our rights.

“Promotion does not seem to fit all the rules; no so. It’s just as fitting and starting, ”Gennie Gebhart, executive director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a private advocacy group, told me.

I do not know if there will be a federal law. Gridlock rules, and these rules are tough. But after the lobby and the complaint, the details of the dispute over personal information changed.


  • Yikes in cryptocurrencies: The value of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies has been steadily declining, with my colleague David Yaffe-Bellany reporting that cryptocurrencies have risen as a risky commodity.

    Also, the TerraUSD virtual currency should be worth about $ 1 each, and it has fallen below that level. Here’s why that’s so big, from my colleagues at DealBook.

  • Local florist now submitting to Amazon: In order to speed up shipments to rural areas in the US, Amazon has been experimenting with paying small businesses a few dollars a pack to send orders to nearby homes, Recode reports.

  • Instagram believes a new father likes “disability” and “fear.” A Washington Post journalist explores why pornographic images affect her newborn Instagram feed and commenters on ways to restart social media algorithms when they are not working on three. (Registration may be required.)

Puppppy come straight to your face!


We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what you would like us to research. You can contact us at ontech@nytimes.com

If you did not receive this newsletter in your inbox, Please register here. You can also read Previous From Tech Line.

Leave a Comment